A sterile landscape… September 9th 2012

A place incapable of supporting life as we know it – a good description of where ECB monetary policy is leading us. Currency debasement is almost certainly where we are headed because of Dr. Aghi’s assertion that the euro is irreversible, not despite it. He bravely assumes that in making such a statement he is creating an aura of consensus and strength. In its current form the euro is a busted flush and is being held together solely by political intransigence and ECB connivance. From the very beginning the rules of engagement were ignored because without political and fiscal centralisation they weren’t going to work anyway.

 But did this stop most of the eurozone countries – and the Southern “Methadone” Zone in particular – from getting on board the gravy train and going on one hell of a trip courtesy of German style interest rates. It would have been rude not to! And no worries about the lack of a long term structure to keep this thing on the rails; we can deal with that later. Well later is now and guess what? They all want to stay on the train but can no longer afford the fare; ignoring the fact that they never could in the first place.

 One of the many problems the eurozone faces, along with the US, UK, Japan et al, is how to service their massive debt burden. They can’t, but insist on reapplying the band aid to create the illusion of progress. As Einstein put it, “insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” We now have OMT to ponder upon – Outright Monetary Transactions. My reaction thus far has been “OMG!” Typical of an ill conceived contrivance, the press release on the “technical” features of OMT comprises 17 short sentences; one of which says, “the liquidity created through Outright Monetary Transactions will be fully sterilised,” but doesn’t say how – that would just be too technical!

 Money “printing” involves a central bank buying “assets”, usually sovereign debt, and crediting the seller with money that it has created electronically. The theory being that this money is used to encourage spending by way of loans to consumers and corporates, but which has the potential outcome of higher inflation. It should also drive short term rates down if, like with the OMT operation, the ECB is buying at the short end of the curve – the complete reverse of the Fed’s Operation Twist by the way. The announcement of OMT has had the desired effect on rates, especially Spanish and Italian, where the cost of new issuance was creating the debt servicing issue mentioned earlier. However with more than a nod to the Bundesbank, the ECB has declared that it will sterilise the purchases so that there will be no inflationary effect. They can do this either by selling other assets, for example long dated issues or attract deposits at the ECB both of which remove the newly created money from circulation. The first option is unlikely as they really don’t want to drive longer term rates upwards, so they are left with the second or they could instead sell some of their gold reserves, but that would be akin to selling the family “silver”. They wouldn’t do that would they? Well they might! Thinking that politicians and central bankers wouldn’t be so crass is another example of one of life’s “heroic” assumptions. The Chinese would have it off them in a trice and how would that help the cause?

 Currently, such is the lack of trust in the interbank market that attracting money into ECB deposits is not a short term problem, but by such sterilisation the benefit of loan growth on spending is lost. So this is just another short term breathing space to allow the PIIGS to refinance their maturing debt at less penal rates, but does absolutely nothing to solve the longer term problems of creating growth in economies stifled by ECB “conditionality”; a very sterile landscape indeed. But cheer up! QE3 will be along any day now to help the banks remain solvent for a while longer. Can exits stage right after another good kicking…


 

Plus ca change….September 6th 2012

The View decided that nothing was going to happen in August, which happened to be spot on, hence the radio silence. Having sat through Dr. Aghi’s plan to save the “irreversible” euro this afternoon it looks like ”nothing new” in September either! When asked if the council’s decision to go ahead with outright monetary transactions (OMT) was unanimous he replied in classic central bank speak. “The decision was not unanimous, but that is not to say that it was not unanimous.” The English double negative is often hard to grasp by those for whom it is not a first language, but I am not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

 The dissenter was almost certainly Jens Weidmann the president of the Bundesbank, although both Austria and the Netherlands have said recently that they will not provide any further funds for other countries bailouts. So if the good doctor thinks he is going to get eurozone government approval for this latest in a long line of ineffective plans he had better have already started on the next one. I lost count of the number of times he used the word “conditionality” and that “the ECB would remain independent.”

 Conditionality means more austerity which will knock a big hole in the ECB’s estimates of growth. For 2012 their projected number is negative and for 2013 the range will be -0.4% to 1.4%. Yet equity markets are off to the races. This too we have seen before followed by a reversal as soon as some bright spark alerts the herd to the nakedness of the emperor. The ECB has in effect said that they will provide assistance to countries whose bond markets are “mispriced” – a dangerous assertion to make as any trader knows only too well – but if the rules of engagement are broken then the deal is off. How many times have the governments of Greece, Italy and Spain said one thing and done another – in fact I can’t think why I am singling out these three countries; name me any government, or central bank for that matter, that doesn’t follow this particular “strategy”!

 The German constitutional court is due to rule on the efficacy of the ESM on the 12th. If it was indeed Weidmann who voted “nein” and had the tacit approval of la Merkel and Dr Strangelove then the “irreversibility” of the euro is going to be tested. If not, and they give it the green light, then we await the to see the hand played by the King of Keynesianism who will be itching to give us QE3 (go and re-read his Jackson Hole epistle – he is seriously worried about US growth and unemployment). When that happens you had best be long a few bars of the barbarous relic.