May 29th 2011 – Is this what Greece really wants?

As the euro crisis staggers on Greek EU commissioner Maria Damanaki has raised the prospect of her country being forced out of the euro zone if it does not quickly assert control over its wayward public finances. She said that “Either we agree with our creditors on a programme of tough sacrifices and results, undertaking our responsibilities to our past, or we return to the drachma. Everything else is of secondary importance.”

However, the spokesman for economics commissioner Olli Rehn immediately dismissed the suggestion that Greece might return to the drachma. “The scenario of Greece leaving the euro has not been and is not on the table in the euro group of ministers,” he said. Given the now infamous quote by Jean-Claude Juncker, Luxembourg PM and Head Euro-Zone Finance Minister that “When it becomes serious, you have to lie” that statement must be viewed with some scepticism.

Greece is facing “austerity” whatever is allowed to happen next. They have three choices. They do it themselves, which looks unlikely given past performance; the EU forces it on them, with a minimal amount of debt restructuring, or thirdly they take the nuclear option and kiss the EU and the euro goodbye.

Without a significant restructuring of debt with the first two options, the inevitable outcome is merely put off for another day, but is the preferred option of the ECB and the eurozone finance committee. They are acutely aware that the banking system would be tipped into another round of refinancing (best case scenario!) if debt restructuring for any or all of the PIGS became a reality. They will of course deny this as the latest series of stress tests on the European banks has determined that there is “nothing to see here so please move on”.

Returning to the “new” drachma would force a debt restructuring by default along with a rather unpleasant devaluing of the currency. Belarus has just tried this trick and overnight imported goods, notably food and fuel, have quadrupled in price. On this basis Greece would again become the destination of choice for holiday makers seeking a bargain…once the riots and general mayhem had died down!

So the Greeks, and their stronger European “partners”, find themselves between a rock and a bigger rock. The voters in Germany and Finland have signalled that they will not foot the bill and their counterparts in Spain, Ireland, Portugal and Greece do not want to pay the price either. It is not as if this is just a eurozone problem. The march of globalisation means that “little old Greece” whose economic footprint in global terms is relevant only to the Greeks could be the first in a long line of dominoes to fall.

Economists are fond of believing that people act rationally. In fact they tend to act more like sheep as they are fed a diet of misinformation by politicians (it will become known as Junkerism…) and the MSM (main stream media). But if you combine adversity, brought on by austerity, with nationalistic tendencies (as expressed by the aforementioned voters), the emotional dam bursts and anyone with a cursory understanding of human behaviour will understand that the concept of rational thought in such circumstances, is not just irrational, but truly insane! Or maybe it’s just being rationally insane!

So I wish the Greeks well – if you want to understand rational insanity visit a Greek taverna any night of the week – and leave you with some pertinent quotes du jour.

“The last duty of a central banker is to tell the public the truth.” Alan Blinder vice chairman of the Federal Reserve 1994-96

“A hundred wagon loads of thoughts will not pay a single ounce of debt” – Italian Proverb

“Bureaucracy defends the status quo long past the time when the quo has lost its status.”
- Laurence J. Peter

“Our constitutions purport to be established by ‘the people,’ and, in theory, ‘all the people’ consent to such government as the constitutions authorize. But this consent of ‘the people’ exists only in theory. It has no existence in fact. Government is in reality established by the few; and these few assume the consent of all the rest, without any such consent being actually given.”
Lysander Spooner

May 16th 2011 – Who’s going to buy all those Treasuries?

As we approach the June deadline for the end of the Fed’s quantitative easing program, the markets are telling us that QE3 is becoming a very remote possibility, at least in the short term, or is it all “sell in May and go away”? That bit of folklore only tends to work half the time and winning on the toss of a coin does not represent good odds.

There is no doubt that the tentative global recovery is beginning to slow and the commodity markets have taken the brunt. Surprisingly, for some, bond markets have been having a good run with 10 year Treasury yields back to 3.15% against a peak in February of 3.76%. Can we really believe that this is a flight to “quality”? The big aggressive buyer has been the Fed as indicated by the rise in their total assets as shown in the chart below courtesy of Fullermoney.

As you will see the rise has been so great that they have had to resort to mathematical notation as there is not enough room in the margin for all the “noughts”! In percentage terms the rise since QE1 has been greater than for the whole of the period from 1995 to 2008. Over the course of the next 5 years some 70% of the total current Treasury issuance will have to be repaid as a result of borrowing short rather than long as opposed to the position in the UK which is the only good thing going for the “sceptered isle” right now.

The Treasury can of course roll over these redemptions into more short term debt but who is going to buy it if the Fed decides that enough is enough? I am told that this is a very big market and for many of the serious players the agenda is to maintain the status quo rather than actually profit from the exercise. The assumption that “we have always got these issues away in the past and therefore we always will in the future” is just another form of complacency.

The Chinese and Russians are talking about an alternative to the dollar as the world’s reserve currency and with central banks around the world accumulating the barbarous relic as fast as they can the suggestion is that whatever happens gold backing will return. The Fed will tell you that there is not enough gold to cover the current issuance of fiat money. Maybe not at $1500 an ounce; but try doing the sums at $10,000!